Satyabadi Jena v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of CRLMC permitting parties to record compromise statements in trial court. Interim order dated 27th January 2014 was vacated.
What did the court decide?
CRLMC disposed; interim order dated 27th January 2014 vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.217 of 2014
Satyabadi Jena and others …. Petitioners
Mr. K. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. J. Katikia, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
20.05.2022
- Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that the compromise has been reached between the Petitioners on the one hand, and Opposite Party No.2-Complainant on the other. He refers to Annexure-2 which seems to be a handwritten document and signed in Odia, which is not in the form of an affidavit.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should dispose of the CRLMC allowing parties to record compromise statements and vacating the interim order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satyabadi Jena and others
- respondent
State of Orissa
- respondent
Opposite Party No.2-Complainant
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court