This judgment dismisses a petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. held that the FIR discloses a cognizable offence and no statutory bar exists to its registration, thus warranting dismissal without interference with the trial process.
Prayer to quash the proceeding in G.R. Case No. 1771 of 2011 is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.384 of 2012
Chakara @ Chakradhar Pradhan and others
Petitioners
-versus-
…. State of Orissa and another Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER 11.04.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
lodged is nothing but tissues of falsehood. The same as such liable to be quashed.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can quash the FIR when it discloses a cognizable offence and there is no statutory bar against registration.
Whether the Court has power to examine the veracity of allegations if petitioner produces evidence during trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chakara @ Chakradhar Pradhan and others
State of Orissa
Another Opposite Party
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
