CrPC 482 petition seeking quashal of order taking cognizance of offences. Petitioner's application dismissed with liberty to raise contentions at charge framing stage. Conditional bail directed if petitioner moves for bail within six weeks.
Application dismissed; liberty to raise contentions at framing of charge; conditional bail directed if moved within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1748 of 2010
Subash Chandra Sahoo.
…. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & another.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI ORDER
11.04.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
for the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
MRS
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order taking cognizance of offences under IPC and S.C. & S.T. (PoA) Act.
Whether the petitioner is to be granted bail given his willingness to appear before the Court below.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Subash Chandra Sahoo
State of Odisha
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
S. Pujahari
Parties & counsel
