Laxmidhar@Laxmikanta Biswal v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the CRLMC petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent, authentication fee was unpaid, and service receipt was missing.
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the CRLMC petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent, authentication fee was unpaid, and service receipt was missing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.3679 of 2016
Laxmidhar @ Laxmikanta Biswal …. Petitioner Mr. U.C. Jena, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opp. Party Mr. P.K. Pattnaik, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
27.10.2022
( G. Satapathy)
Judge
Subhasmita
Laxmidhar @ Laxmikanta Biswal
State of Orissa
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court