The petitioner's counsel stated they had no instructions. The Criminal Miscellaneous Case was dismissed for want of instruction without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1289 of 2016
Makunda Dehury and another
…. Petitioners Mr. P.K.Satapathy, Advocate
-versus-
Krushna Chandra Meher and another …. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
27.10.2022
(G. Satapathy) Judge
Priyajit
Makunda Dehury
Krushna Chandra Meher
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
