The court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner at the call.
Matter dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.3455 of 2011
Mamata Mohanty. …. Petitioner
-versus-
….
Kausik Mohanty & others. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
ORDER
16.03.2022
Order No.
22. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. No one appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
Learned counsel for the opposite party nos.8 and 9 is present.
3. Hence, this CRLMC dismissed for non-prosecution.
(S. Pujahari)
Judge
MRS
Page 1 of 1
Mamata Mohanty
Kausik Mohanty
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
