The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application for quashing an F.I.R. as a recalcitrant litigant application filed for Section 482 of Cr.P.C. due to petitioner's non-appearance and unknown case status.
CRLMC stood dismissed for nonprosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.3449 of 2011
Talucha Bhagaban Mohapatra
…. Petitioner
versus-
…. State of Orissa Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER
16.03.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
DA
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. should be quashed for nonprosecution in the absence of petitioner
Whether the petitioner is acting as a recalcitrant litigant given the lack of appearance and unknown case status
Whether the petitioner can seek quashment of cognizance or charge in the future if the case remains subsisting
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Talucha Bhagaban Mohapatra
State of Orissa
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
