In CRLMC No. 296 of 2016, the High Court of Orissa examined an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR. Due to the absence of the petitioners on two consecutive dates, the court dismissed the motion for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.296 of 2016
Jugal Kishore Behera and others …. Petitioners Mr. P.K. Maharaj , Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and another Opp. Parties Mr. S.N.Das, A.S.C. Mr.P.B.Senapati, Advocate for O.P. No.2
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
21.10.2022
( G. Satapathy) Judge
Kishore
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal proceeding under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR and proceedings should be allowed when petitioners are absent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jugal Kishore Behera
State of Odisha
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
