The court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous case where the petitioner applicable for quashing an order refusing relief under Section 205 CrPC, noting a fourteen-year delay that indicated lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
The CRLMC application to quash the earlier order refusing leave to prosecute was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1407 of 2016
Hemanta Kumar Behera
…. Petitioner
Mr. A.C. Rath, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opp. Party Mr.S.R.Roul, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 18.10.2022
( G. Satapathy) Judge
Kishore
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an order refusing relief under Section 205 CrPC should be allowed after fourteen years.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Hemanta Kumar Behera
State of Orissa
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
