The Court dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C seeking to quash a seven-year-old cognizance order due to lack of prosecution and doubt about the survival of the cause of action.
CRLMC dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.2721 of 2016
Mahendra Sahu
…. Petitioner
Mr. R.Panda , Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Orissa (Vigilance) & Opp. Parties another
Addl. Standing Counsel, Vigilance.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
21.09.2022
( G. Satapathy) Judge
// 2 //
Kishore
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to quash a cognizance order taken seven years earlier survives.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahendra Sahu
State of Orissa (Vigilance)
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
