The petitioner applied to quash a cognizance order under Section 482 Cr.P.C., noting the lapse of five years without a stay. The Court dismissed the application on non-prosecution due to the prolonged inactivity.
CRLMC dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1042 of 2016
Sumanta Kumar Naik
…. Petitioner Mr. A.K.Mishra , Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opp. Party Mr.P.Tripathy, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
21.09.2022
( G. Satapathy)
Kishore
// 2 //
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the quashing of the share order dated 03.02.2016 under Section 482 of Cr.P.C given the lapse of five years and non-prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sumanta Kumar Naik
State of Orissa
G. SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
