Application in revisional jurisdiction dismissed as the impugned order adequately protected State interests. No patent infirmity warranted interference. Petitioner directed to dispose of pending proceedings within two months.
CRLMC dismissed; proceedings CPC 02 of 2020-21 disposed of within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 2402 OF 2021
State of Odisha
……… Petitioner
Mr. P. Mohapatra, ASC
-versus-
Dutia Sa
...……… Opposite Party Mr. Jagabandhu Sahu, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
25.04.2022
Order No.
( V.Narasingh ) Judge
Balaram
Page 1 of 1
State of Odisha
Dutia Sa
V. Narasinh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
