The court considered a contempt petition (CONTC). Submitted that the impugned order was already complied with. Accordingly, the contempt petition was dropped.
Dropping of the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 553 OF 2018
Prasanta Kumar Mohanty& others ……… Petitioners Mr. Alok Kumar Das, Adv.
-versus-
G.Mathi Vathanan & others. .……… Opposite Parties/Contemnors Mr. P.Mohapatra,ASC
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE V.NARASINGH
ORDER 22.04.2022 Order No. 06. 1. These matters are taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/ Physical Mode). 2. Heard Mr. Bijaya Kumar Patra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P.Mohapatra, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. 3. It is stated at the Bar that the order from which the present CONTC emanate has already been complied. 4. Taking note of such submission, the CONTC is dropped. ( V.NARASINGH ) Dhal Judge
Prasanta Kumar Mohanty & others
G. Mathi Vathanan & others
V. Narasimha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
