The High Court at Cuttack dismissed a Criminal Misc. Applicability invoked under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an order from 2012, noting the significant delay of ten years and the absence of the respondent.
The CRLMC is dismissed as no respondent appeared and a decade has passed since the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.2387 of 2016
Baikuntha Sahu …. Petitioner Mr. J.N.Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Kishan Agrawal
Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
26.10.2022
( G. Satapathy)
Judge
Kishore
// 2 //
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Criminal Revision under S. 482 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed when no respondent appears and ten years have passed since the impugned order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baikuntha Sahu
Kishan Agrawal
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
