took away valuable articles, which was registered as F.I.R. vide Chamakhandi P.S. Case No.19 of 2014. The police after completion of investigation submitted a final report. However, the Petitioner made a protest, which was registered as 1.C.C. No.12 of 2016 and inquiry was conducted. In the said complaint, when the accused being summoned applied for bail, the Petitioner objected to the same on the ground, inter-alia, that the J.C.V. in question being in his possession having not been produced, he was not entitled to bail as the accused had not produced the so-called weapon of offence, i.e., J.C.V. and also made petition under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. before the S.D.J.M. Chatrapur for production of the alleged weapon of offence (JCV) having registration No.OR-07-Q-9998 along with its driver. Learned Magistrate, however, while addressing the question with reference to Section 91 of Cr.P.C. held that the prayer made is misconceived at this stage. The revision carried against the said order was confirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chatrapur.
