The Court dismissed a quashing petition under Section 482 CrP.C. against a non-bailable warrant issued for non-appearance, finding no illegality since petitioners evaded summons and the case remains uncommitted.
CRLMC application under Section 482 CrP.C. dismissed; petitioners directed to surrender within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1950 of 2022
Judhistir Pradhani and another -versus- State of Odisha
-versus-
Petitioners
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
22.07.2022
learned counsel for the State.
in the aforesaid case, which is triable by court of sessions, were on bail and facing trial, but when the notice was sent to the
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
them for their appearance before the trial court and the same
was returned with a report that “no such named persons are found in the mentioned address” and they did not appear before the trial court on the date fixed, N.B.W.(A) has been issued against them vide the aforesaid order to procure their attendance.
been committed to the court of sessions due to non-appearance
of the Petitioners, this Court finds no illegality and infirmity in
the impugned order.
before the Court in seisin over the matter within six weeks
hence and move for bail and in that event, the Court in seisin over the matter shall consider and dispose of such petition of
the Petitioners in course of the day.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the non-bailable warrant issued for the absence of petitioners whose appearance notice was returned as untraceable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Judhistir Pradhani
another
State of Odisha
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
