The High Court at Cuttack rejected the petitioner's application to quash the FIR, holding that the allegations disclose cognizable offences. Liberty was granted to approach the appropriate forum after the charge sheet was filed.
Application for quashing of the FIR dismissed; liberty granted to approach appropriate forum upon filing of charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1753 of 2011
M/s. MAP Mines and Minerals Ltd. …. Petitioner
versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER
21.03.2022
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the First Information Report (FIR) should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. given that the allegations disclose cognizable offences.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. MAP Mines and Minerals Ltd.
State of Orissa
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
