The High Court declined to quash a non-bailable warrant issued for non-appearance by petitioners. However, the Court allowed petitioners to surrender within four weeks and grant bail on terms, restraining their arrest during this interim period.
Curtailed arrest via N.B.W.(A) for four weeks; bail granted upon surrender within that period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1704 of 2022
Tapan Kumar Das @ Bapi Das and others
…. Petitioners
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
27.07.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
the trial and as such, the order of N.B.W.(A) be quashed and the trial court may be directed to allow them on same bail.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the court should quash the non-bailable warrant issued against petitioners who failed to appear in court and are now willing to surrender.
Whether conditions can be imposed for releasing petitioners on bail upon surrender regarding future cooperation with the trial.
Whether petitioners should be protected from arrest via the N.B.W.(A) until they surrender or a specific period expires.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tapan Kumar Das @ Bapi Das and others
State of Orissa
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
