Disposed
Bipra Dhal v. Pradip Kumar Mohapatra,Ias
Orissa HCCONTC/2191/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application for contempt was disposed of on report of compliance by the applicant.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.2191 Of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
Bipra Dhal
Applicant
Mr. B.K. Nayak(3), Advocate
-versus-
Pradip Kumar Jena, IAS
…. Alleged Contemner
Mr. P.C. Panda, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order No.
2.
ORDER
19.05.2022
1. Mr. Nayak, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicant and submits, there has been compliance and hence, the contempt application has lost its force.
2. Mr. Panda, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of alleged contemner.
3. On compliance reported, the contempt application is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
Sks
Page 1 of 1
Bipra Dhal
Pradip Kumar Jena
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court