Disposed
Sanjay Keshari Mohapatra v. State of Orissa
Orissa HCWP(C)/4599/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4599 of 2022
Sanjay Keshari Mohapatra
Petitioner(s)
Mr. N. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Panda, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
22.03.2022
Order No.
1. This writ petition involves the following prayer:
“ PRAYER
The petitioner therefore prays that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ petition;
Issue notice to the opp.parties, the opp.parties may direct not to allow any pucca road over the Govt. land in Khata no.216, 217, 218, obstructing the water flow coming from five villages through Govt. land. Further the illegal encroacher over the govt. land may be evicted to save the land of the petitioner vide Khata No.89, Mouza-dhamantira, PS – Nimapada, District – Puri from the soil erosion by allowing the flow of water over the Petitioner’s land.
And pass such other order/ orders granting complete relief to the petitioner.”
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for Petitioner that representation at the instance of the Petitioner vide Annexure-4 pending before the Collector, Puri, requires urgent attention.
3. Keeping in view the above submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner and as this Court finds, the representation at the instance of the Petitioner is still pending before the Collector, Puri, this Court directs the Collector, Puri to consider the representation at the instance of the Petitioner vide Annexure-4 and take a lawful decision in the matter taking into account the grounds stated in this writ petition so also the documents appended thereto and if necessary, involving the Petitioner.
4. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of communication of an authenticated copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition by the Petitioner.
5. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above order.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
Ayaskanta Jena
Page 2 of 2
Sanjay Keshari Mohapatra
State of Orissa & Ors.
Biswanath Rath
Ayaskanta Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court