The High Court expressed displeasure at the six-year pendency of a pending Order 39 Rule 2(A) application and ordered the trial court to conclude proceedings within six weeks.
Direction to the Civil Judge, Pattamundai to conclude proceedings under I.A. No.140 of 2016 within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP NO.205 OF 2022
Gabhi Sahoo
Petitioner
Mr.R.K.Rout, Adv.
-versus-
Prafulla Kumar Sahoo & ors.
…. Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
Order
ORDER 17.3.2022
No.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
M.K.Rout
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
whether to dispose of the appeal when the interlocutory application regarding the stay is pending for six years
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gabhi Sahoo
Prafulla Kumar Sahoo
BISWANATH RATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
