The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack allowed bail to the petitioner in a case involving charges under the IPC, POCSO Act, and SC and ST (Protection of Rights of SC and ST) Act. Bail was granted subject to conditions imposed by the trial court.
Petitioner allowed bail on terms and conditions imposed by the trial court, including appearance on posting dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.9692 of 2021
Gunia @ Suresh Lenka
Petitioner
Mr. N.K.Sahoo
Advocate
-versus-
….
State of Odisha Opposite Party
Mr.S.K.Mishra,
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
24.02.2022.
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
and Section 6(1) of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(v) of SC and ST (PA) Act.
(Sashikanta Mishra) AKB Judge
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner qualifies for bail in a case involving offences under the IPC and POCSO Act.
What conditions must be imposed for the petitioner's release on bail.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Gunia @ Suresh Lenka
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
