Petitioners sought bail. The court, considering the nature of accusations and prima facie evidence, rejected the prayer for bail but permitted its renewal after witness examination.
Prayer for bail rejected; open to renew after examination of material witnesses including eyewitness.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 9652 of 2021
Bharat Mahanta & Anr.
.…
Petitioners
Mr. B.S. Panigrahi, Advocate
State of Odisha
.… Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Maharaj, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
24.02.2022
Order No.
2.
Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.
materials prima facie in support thereof, I am not inclined to allow the prayer for bail, which is therefore, rejected. It is however open to the petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after examination of some material witnesses including the eyewitness.
A.K. Rana
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail is to be allowed or rejected.
Bharat Mahanta & Anr.
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
