In this bail application, the petitioner appeared in absentia. The court observed that the bail application has been pending since August 2021 and no one appeared for more than a year, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter. Consequently, the application was dismissed.
Bail Application (BLAPL No.6367 of 2021) is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.6367 of 2021
Karuna Hial
…. Petitioner
Mr. S.S. Ray(2), Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opp. Party Mr. S.R. Roul, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
27.09.2022
(G. Satapathy) Judge
Subhasmita
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant or dismiss the pending bail application BLAPL No.6367 of 2021 due to non-appearance by the petitioner.
Whether the bail application should be dismissed for non-prosecution after one year of pendency.
Karuna Hial
State of Orissa
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
