The court dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a 2005 order, noting seventeen years had elapsed without a stay and expression of doubt about the survival of the cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1290 of 2016
Budu @ Harish Jena
…. Petitioner Mr. R.R.Ray, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opp. Party Mr.P.K.Patnaik, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
24.09.2022
( G. Satapathy) Judge
// 2 //
Kishore
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cause of action survives for the petitioner seventeen years after the passing of the impugned order issuing N.B.W.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Budu @ Harish Jena
State of Orissa
G. SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
