BLAPL No.602 of 2022 was dismissed as not pressed because the petitioner's counsel stated the application was filed without prior notice of the pendency of an earlier application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.602 of 2022
Aditya Bllav Nayak …. Petitioner Mr.B.N. Satpathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. D.R. Parida, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER 21.03.2022
Order No.
(D.Dash), Judge.
Himansu
Page 1 of 1
Aditya Bllav Nayak
State of Odisha
D.Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
