The High Court of Orissa dismissed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., holding that after reviewing the petitioner's role in a capital case and prior orders, re-consideration of the bail prayer was not warranted.
Application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed; urgent certified copy issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL NO.674 OF 2022
Sanyasi Maharana
…. Petitioner
Mr.D. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Nayak, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER 17.03.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
and on going through the earlier orders dated 11.01.2021 & 08.11.2021 passed in ABLAPL No.14478 of 2020 and BLAPL No.5487 of 2021 respectively, I am not inclined to re-consider the prayer grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(D. Dash),
Basu
Judge.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. after considering his role in the alleged offence and earlier orders.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanyasi Maharana
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
