record, this Court for the limited purpose of bail hardly finds any relevancy in the nature, number of situs and sizes of injuries received by the victims as the intention of the accused-petitioner became manifest when he drove his four wheeler into the crowd, particularly amidst the protesters, despite the desistance, dissuasion and caution from the police personnel on duty which resulted in ramming and injuries to the police personnel and the protesters / members of the general public. As it reveals, while giving threat to run the vehicle over the protesters, he drove the vehicle into the crowd that too using the registration number of a different vehicle. Such indulgence and overt act can never be treated as becoming of a public representative. That apart, the series of criminal cases attached to his antecedent speak against his credibility to abide by condition, if any, imposed in case of his bail, more so when he has also not abide by the conditions not to indulge in any criminal activities while allowing him to be released on bail in connection with Balugaon P.S. Case No.156
