The Single Judge rejected the petitioner's pre-arrest bail application, holding it was a futile attempt to kill judicial time as the petitioner had failed to surrender before the trial court despite earlier liberty and prior rejection.
The prayer for pre-arrest bail stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.2952 of 2022
Keshab Charan Moharana
…. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: THE JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER 20.05.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
(S. Pujahari) Judge
PKS
3 issues framed by the court
Whether there is reason to review the earlier order rejecting pre-arrest bail after the petitioner failed to surrender before the trial court.
Whether the petitioner's repeated approach to this Court warrants granting the current bail application.
Whether the prayer for pre-arrest bail under Sections 307/34 IPC should be dismissed as an attempt to kill judicial time.
Keshab Charan Moharana
State of Odisha
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
