The Court disposed of two joint bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. arising from a murder case. Rejecting arguments that petitioners were not named in the FIR, the Court found a prima facie case based on witness statements and injury evidence, refusing bail.
Bail application of both petitioners rejected and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.11419 of 2021
Tuna Pradhan …. Petitioner Mr. J. Sahoo , Advocate -versus…. State of Orissa Opp. Party
…. Opp. Party Mr. S.N. Das, A.S.C.
BLAPL No.11430 of 2021
Order No.
Kumara Bisoyi …. Petitioner
Mr. J. Sahoo , Advocate
-versus-
….
State of Orissa Opp. Party
Mr. S.N. Das, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
13.09.2022
BLAPL No.11419 of 2021 & BLAPL No.11430 of 2021
// 2 //
2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 328 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Kabisuryanagar for commission of offences punishable under Section 302/323/506/120-B/34 of I.P.C. on the allegation of committing murder of the deceased along with co accused persons in furtherance of their common intention.
// 3 //
reject the bail application of both the petitioners.
(G. Satapathy)
Subhasmita
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to petitioners accused of murder.
Whether absence of FIR names and overt acts bars rejection of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tuna Pradhan
Kumara Bisoyi
State of Orissa
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
