The High Court at Cuttack rejected the petitioner's bail application (BLAPL) in a case involving the alleged commission of offences under the NDPS Act. The court declined the prayer considering the seized contraband exceeded the commercial quantity. The application was dismissed.
Bail application (BLAPL) rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 10563 of 2021
Jagamohan Tarasia@ Rajesh …. Petitioner
Mr. Sidhant Kumar Jena,
Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha Opposite Party
….
Mr. S.N. Das, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
21.01.2022
Order No.
3.
( Sashikanta Mishra)
Judge
B.C. Tudu
Page 1 of 1
Page 2 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to a petitioner arrested for a commercial quantity of contraband under the NDPS Act?
Whether the prayer for bail satisfies the conditions for release in a case involving more than commercial quantity of drugs?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagamohan Tarasia@ Rajesh
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
