Allowed

Sahaban @ Sahajan Box @ Falla v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC20 Jan 2022BLAPL/10299/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order allowing bail to petitioner charged with robbery under IPC Section 395 read with Arms Act Section 25. Release granted considering detention period and co-accused bail status. Conditions imposed for trial court appearance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with condition to personally appear before trial court on each date of case posting. Court in seisin to impose other terms.

Sahaban @ Sahajan Box @ Falla Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No. 10299 of 2021

¶3

Sahaban @ Sahajan Box … Petitioner @ Falla

¶4

Mr. P.R. Singh, Advocate

¶5

Versus -

¶6

State of Odisha

¶7

…

¶8

Opposite Party Mr. P. Tripathy, Addl. Standing Counsel

¶9

CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

ORDER

20.01.2022

Order No.

This matter is taken up through virtual mode.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

¶16

The petitioner is in custody since 29.09.2021 in connection with Dhenkanal Sadar P.S. Case No.616 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1436 of 2020 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Dhenkanal for the alleged commission of offence under Section 395 of IPC read with Section 25 of Arms Act.

¶17

It is alleged that the petitioner in association with several other persons committed robbery by assaulting the informant while he was going in a Bolero vehicle. They assaulted him by means of deadly weapons and took away cash of Rs.8,000/-.

¶18

Considering the submissions, materials on record, the period of detention already undergone and also the fact that all the co-accused similarly situated have already been released on bail, I am inclined to allow the prayer for bail. Let the petitioner be released on bail on such terms and conditions as

¶19

Page 1 of 1

¶20

the court in seisin over the matter may deem fit and proper to impose including the condition that he shall personally appear before the trial Court on each date of posting of the case without fail.

¶21

BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶22

As the restrictions due to resurgence of Covid-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No. 4587, dated 25^th March, 2020, modified by Notice No. 4798, dated 15^th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos. 514 and 515 dated 7^th January,

¶23

2022.
( Sashikanta Mishra)
Judge

¶24

A.K. Rana

¶25

Page 2 of 2

Sahaban @ Sahajan Box @ Falla v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahaban @ Sahajan Box @ Falla v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Abhaya Kumar Jani Vs State of Odisha

Kabita Samal Vs State of Odisha

Ranjit Naik Vs State of Odisha

Narayan Palei Vs State of Odisha

Gandaram Bhoi Vs State of Odisha