Allowed

Ranjit Naik v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC20 Jan 2022BLAPL/10332/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa allowed the bail application of petitioners Ranjit Naik and another. The petitioners were in custody for alleged offences under sections 294/395 IPC, section 25 of the Arms Act, and section 3 of the E.S. Act. Considering one co-accused was already on bail, the court granted bail subject to terms including appearing before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail with conditions to appear before the trial court on each date of posting.

Ranjit Naik Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No.10332 of 2021

¶3

Ranjit Naik and another

Petitioners

Mr. P.K.Mishra,

Advocate

-versus-

…. State of Odisha Opposite Party Mr.S.K.Mishra, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 20.01.2022.

¶9

Order No.

¶10

¶11

This matter is taken up through virtual mode.

¶12

Heard Mr. P.K.Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. S.K.Mishra, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

¶13

The petitioners are in custody since 26^th August, 2021 in connection with Parjanga P.S. Case No.324/2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No.317/2021 pending in the court of learned J.M.F.C., Parjanga for the alleged commission of the offence under Section 294/395 of I.P.C. and Section 25 of the Arms Act and Section 3 of the E.S. Act.

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

// 2 //

¶16

Having regard to the submissions made, the materials on record and the fact that one of the co-accused namely, Samir Naik has already been released on bail by order of this Court passed in BLAPL No.9711/2021, I am inclined to allow the prayer for bail.

¶17

Let the Petitioners be released on bail in the aforesaid case on such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the court in seisin over the matter including the condition that they shall appear before the trial court on each date of posting of the case without fail.

¶18

The BLAPL is disposed of.

¶19

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned Advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020, modified by Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021 and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7^th January, 2022.

¶20

(Sashikanta Mishra) AKB Judge

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

// 3 //

¶23

Page 3 of 2

Ranjit Naik v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Naik v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Abhaya Kumar Jani Vs State of Odisha

Kabita Samal Vs State of Odisha

Narayan Palei Vs State of Odisha

Gandaram Bhoi Vs State of Odisha

Sahaban @ Sahajan Box @ Falla Vs State of Odisha