The High Court ordered the trial court to conclude the trial within six months from the receipt of this order, noting the petitioner has been in custody since June 2020.
Expedited trial within six months allowed; bail prayer renewable if trial delayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 1009 OF 2021
Sharat Chandra Malik @ Sarat Chandra Malik
……… Petitioner Mr. A.C. Behera, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha ...……… Opposite Party
Miss S. Mishra, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
26.04.2022
Order No.
04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
3. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that,
trial has commenced in the case at hand and two prosecution
witnesses have already been examined in the meantime.
Page 1 of 2
Balaram
( V.Narasingh )
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should expedite the conclusion of the trial considering the petitioner is in custody since June 2020.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sharat Chandra Malik @ Sarat Chandra Malik
State of Odisha
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
