The High Court of Orissa directed the petitioner to surrender before the Court of S.D.J.M., Hindol, and move for bail within three weeks. The High Court allowed the application on such terms as just and proper. The application is disposed of.
Release on bail on such terms as deemed just by the S.D.J.M., Hindol upon surrender within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL NO.64 OF 2020
Raju Laljat @ Raju Jat
Petitioner
Mr.S.R. Mulia, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party. Mr.S.K. Nayak, AGA,
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER
Order No.
28.03.2022
the absence of any other impediment, it is directed that in the event the Petitioner surrenders before the Court in seisin of the case in connection with Hindol P.S. Case No.102 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. Case No.397 of 2019 pending on the file of the learned S.D.J.M., Hindol within three weeks hence and moves for his release on bail, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper by the said Court.
(D. Dash), Judge.
Narayan
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to surrender and move for bail on his release?
Raju Laljat @ Raju Jat
State of Odisha
D.Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
