Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Cr.P.C. s. 438 in an IPC fraud/embezzlement case. Court refused bail, directing surrender and subsequent bail application to be considered on merits to enable approach to higher forum if necessary.
Application dismissed with direction to surrender and apply for regular bail; subsequent bail to be disposed early.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL NO.15866 OF 2019
Paritosh Mandal
…. Petitioner Mr.S. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr.S.K. Nayak, AGA.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER
Order No.
28.03.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
aforesaid case and moves for his release on bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit and disposed of early in accordance with law so as to enable the Petitioner to approach the next higher forum early in case necessity so arises.
The case record be made available at the cost of the Petitioner.
Narayan
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner implicated in offences under section 406, 419, 423, 465, and 34 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Paritosh Mandal
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
