Allowed

Dhruba Charan Das v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC24 Jan 2022ABLAPL/16538/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa allowed an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail in a case involving theft, cheating, and criminal conspiracy, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond with sureties and complying with conditions regarding interrogation and witness interference.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties for the like amount, subject to conditions of appearing for interrogation and not interfering with witness

Dhruba Charan Das Vs State of Odisha — Cheating and Forgery | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

ABLAPL No.16538 of 2021

¶3

Dhruba Charan Das

¶4

…. Petitioner

¶5

Mr.S.S. Mohanty, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

State of Odisha

¶8

…. Opp. Party

¶9

Mr.J.P. Patra, Addl. Standing Counsel

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
24.01.2022
01. This matter is taken up through video
conferencing.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶13

This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Jakharpura P.S. Case No.111 of 2021 corresponding to C.T. Case No.1526 of 2021 pending before the learned J.M.F.C., Jajpur Road for commission of alleged offences under sections 407, 420, 379, 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the offences are triable by Magistrate and the F.I.R. has been lodged against one Saroj Kumar Patra and the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R.

¶15

// 2 //

¶16

Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is a farmer and is a Biju Krushaka Kalyana Yojana card holder and on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused, he is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case and therefore, the prayer for anticipatory bail may be favourably considered.

¶17

Learned counsel for the State submits that the accusation against the petitioner relates to commission of the offence under section 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, nature of accusation against the petitioner and the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate, I am inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that he shall make himself available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing any facts to the Courts

¶19

Page 2 of 3

¶20

// 3 //

¶21

or to the Investigating Officer.

¶22

Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

¶23

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶24

Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed vide office order dated 7^th January 2022.

( S.K. Sahoo)

PKSahoo

Judge

Page 3 of 3

Dhruba Charan Das v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhruba Charan Das v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kusum Devi @ Ray Vs State of Odisha

Papu Das @ Ananta Das Vs State of Odisha

Biju Naik @ Bijay Kumar Naik Vs State of Odisha

Sandhyarani Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

Arindam Barik Vs State of Odisha

Sarat Naik Vs State of Odisha