This is a thin dismissal of the ABLAPL where the High Court of Orissa noted no FIR was filed, allowed the petitioner to act post-registration, and disposed of the matter without granting anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.16537 of 2021
Arindam Barik
Petitioner
Mr.Pradipta Verma, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opp. Party
Mr.J.P. Patra, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
Order No.
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 24.01.2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date no F.I.R. has been instituted, but the petitioner is apprehending arrest.
The petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps after registration of the F.I.R.
Accordingly, the ABLAPL is disposed of.
Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed vide office order dated 7th January 2022.
( S.K. Sahoo)
Judge
PKSahoo
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
Arindam Barik
State of Odisha
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
