High Court of Orissa dismissed a second application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an NDPS case, holding it not entertainable due to no change in circumstances since the earlier rejected order.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed as not entertainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL NO.14839 OF 2021
Sanjay Sahu
…. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Satpathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Another
…. Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Nayak, AGA.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER
Order No.
11.03.2022
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(D. Dash), Judge.
Narayan
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second application under Section-438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail is maintainable in the absence of changed circumstances.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Order dated 27.08.2018Referred¶14
ABLAPL No.10568 of 2018
Sanjay Sahu
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
