This single-judge bench of the Orissa High Court dismissed an appeal regarding succession rights. Relying on a 2009 judgment (appeal registered in 2009) and the later Vineeta Sharma decision, the court found no substantial question of law and rejected the plea to alter a final decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RSA NO.283 OF 2009
Khageswar Dwibedy
…. Appellant Mr.S.K. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Smt. Shantilata Pati & Another
…. Respondents Mr.B.H. Mohanty, Advocate
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER
Order No.
10.03.2022
3 . Mr.S.K.Mishra, learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr.D.P.Mohanty, learned counsel for the Respondents are present.
It is submitted at the Bar that the preliminary decree, which has been called in question the present Appeal, has been made final and that being sealed and signed, the parties have altered their position accordingly.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Basu
for the purpose. As per the said decision, which has come to be pronounced after filing of this second Appeal, the answer to the said substantial question of law runs in favour of Respondent No.1 which would lead to confirm the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below.
(D. Dash),
Judge.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the main substantial question of law regarding the applicability of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, in light of the Vineeta Sharma judgment, merits admission of the appeal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vineeta Sharma vs. Rakesh SharmaFollowed¶18
Vineeta Sharma –V- Rakesh Sharma; (2020) 9 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khageswar Dwibedy
Smt. Shantilata Pati
D. DASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
