Allowed

Sk. Mozafar Mohammad v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC8 Feb 2022ABLAPL/1135/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Orissa granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case involving offences under sections 341, 323, 294, and 506 IPC, directing release with a bail bond and standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner on bail upon arrest, subject to furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and meeting interrogation and witness protection conditions.

Sk. Mozafar Mohammad Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

ABLAPL No.1135 of 2022

¶3

Sk. Mozafar Mohammad …. Petitioner

¶4

Mr. D. Behuray, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha

¶7

…. Opp. Party

¶8

Mr. A.K. Beura, Addl. Standing Counsel

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO

Order No.

ORDER 08.02.2022

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Video Conferencing/Physical Mode).

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶16

This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with C.T. Case No.110 of 2022 arising out of Balichandrapur P.S. Case No.34 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Chandikhole for alleged commission of offences under sections 341/323/294/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

Perused the F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the offences are triable by Magistrate and the only non-bailable offence is under section 506 of the Indian Penal Code and on hearing the

¶19

// 2 //

¶20

learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that he shall make himself available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Investigating Officer.

¶21

Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶22

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

¶23

RKM

¶24

Page 2 of 2

Sk. Mozafar Mohammad v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sk. Mozafar Mohammad v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashis Mahakud Vs State of Odisha

Vinod Agarwal Vs State of Odisha

Roshan @ Mir Raushan Ali Vs State of Odisha

Manmath Kumar Swain Vs State of Odisha

Amit Bhoi Vs State of Odisha

Trailokyanantha Behura @ Baliarsingh @ Chandrakanta Ray Vs State of Odisha