Quashed
Vinod Agarwal v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCCRLA/534/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Odisha accepted the appellant's memo seeking withdrawal of the criminal appeal and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
CRLA disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
CRLA No.534 of 2020
¶3
Vinod Agarwal ….
¶4
Appellant
¶5
Mr. B.B. Nanda, Advocate
¶6
-versus-
¶7
- State of Odisha
2. M/s. Maa Tarini
Eastcon Pvt. Ltd.
3. Niranjan Rana
4. Gitanjali Rana
5. Simrana Rana
6. Somalika Rana …. Respondents
Mr. A.K. Beura,
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
07.02.2022
02. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement
(video conferencing/physical mode).
¶8
A memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant seeking permission to withdraw the criminal appeal with liberty to file a better application.
¶9
Memo is accepted.
¶10
Accordingly, the CRLA is disposed of as withdrawn.
¶11
RKM
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Vinod Agarwal
- respondent
State of Odisha
- respondent
M/s. Maa Tarini Eastcon Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
Niranjan Rana
- respondent
Gitanjali Rana
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court