The Court disposed of the writ petition seeking steeping up of pay as infructuous due to the efflux of time following the petitioner's retirement from service.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No.906 OF 2004
Baboo Bhukta ….. Petitioner
Mr. L. Pradhan,
Advocate
Vs.
State of Orissa & Ors. ….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
17.12.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
1
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended
that the petitioner claims for steeping up of pay and in
the meantime the petitioner has retired from service.
3. In view of the above, by efflux of time, the writ
petition has become infructuous and accordingly, the
same is disposed of as infructuous.
Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition praying for steeping up of pay is infructuous due to the efflux of time after the petitioner's retirement.
Baboo Bhukta
State of Orissa
B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
