A writ petition filed by Ghanashyam Das was disposed of as infructuous, contending that the petition had become so due to the efflux of time.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No.863 OF 2005
Ghanashyam Das ….. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Rath,
Advocate
Vs.
State of Orissa & Ors. ….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
17.12.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
1
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended
that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become
infructuous.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is
disposed of as infructuous.
Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Ghanashyam Das
State of Orissa & Ors.
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
