In this old writ petition from 1995, the petitioner appeared without instructions. The court disposed of the petition with liberty to approach the concerned authority if any cause of action survives.
The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to approach the authority concerned if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 679 of 1995
Vijayalaxmi Vishoyi …. Petitioner
Mr. Manoj Mishra, Sr. Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and Ors. …. Opp. Parties State Counsel
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No.
01
ORDER
25.10.2021
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no
instructions, since it is an old case of the year 1995, therefore
the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the
petitioner to approach the authority concerned if any cause of
action still survives.
3. With the liberty aforesaid, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
GDS
Page 1 of 1
Vijayalaxmi Vishoyi
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
