In this 1999 writ petition, the petitioner had no instructions due to the age of the case, resulting in the disposal of the petition with liberty to approach relevant authorities if any cause of action survives.
liberty to approach concerned authority if cause of action survives
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 326 of 1999
Khirod Kar …. Petitioner Mr. B.B. Acharya, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties . State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No. 01
ORDER 16.09.2021 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions, since it is an old case of the year 1999, therefore, the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned if any cause of action still survives.
With the liberty aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
GDS
Page 1 of 1
Khirod Kar
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
