Gobinda Swain v. R.T.O., Angul
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging tax and penalty on a vehicle. The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's case based on a prior judgment.
What did the court decide?
Directing the opposite party to consider the petitioner's case in light of Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., Keonjhar.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.28259 OF 2021
Gobinda Swain ….. Petitioner
Mr. S.M. Singh, Advocate
Vs.
RTO, Angul ….. Opposite parties
Mr. Pravakar Behera, S.C. Transport Deptt.
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
16.09.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up by video conferencing 1 mode. 2. Heard Mr. S.M. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Behera, learned Standing Counsel for Transport Department.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's vehicle should be considered for tax purposes in light of the judgment in Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., Keonjhar.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gobinda Swain
- respondent
RTO, Angul
Coram
B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court