Kalu Nayak v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition, filed under W.P.(C) No.9769 of 2010, was dismissed as withdrawn. The hearing was conducted via video conferencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9769 of 2010
…. Kulu Nayak
Petitioner
Mr. Prasanta Kumar Nanda, Advocate
-versus-
Order No.
….
State of Odisha and Others Opposite Parties
Mr. Subir Palit
Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
20.04.2021
1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the
writ petition.
- The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
- As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kulu Nayak
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court