Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition as the matter became infructuous. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous upon petitioner's withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 9627 of 2012
Giridhari Lal Sharma
…. Petitioner Ms. S. Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and Others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. P.P. Mohanty, A.G.A.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER 13.07.2021
Order No.
This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
Heard Ms. S.Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.P. Mohanty, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State.
Ms. S.Das, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the same and files a memo to that effect.
Mr. Mohanty, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State has no objection to the same.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the petitioners may utilize a
Page 1 of 2
printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798 dated 15th April. 2021.
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge
Sukanta
( Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Giridhari Lal Sharma
State of Orissa
S.K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
