Petitioner withdrew the writ petition as the matter had been settled out of court. The Single Judge Bench disposed of the petition as withdrawn under COVID-19 restrictions allowing electronic printouts.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 1689 of 2021
Mrs. Shikha Singhi
Petitioner
Mr. Gautam Acharya, Sr. Advocate
-versus-
Bank of Baroda & Another
…. Opp. Parties
Addl. Government Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Order No.
ORDER
13.07. 2021
The matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
Heard Mr. Gautam Acharya, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Acharya, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner submits that since the matter has been settled out of the Court, the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No. 4587 dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021.
(S.K. Mishra) Judge
( Savitri Ratho)
Judge
puspa
Mrs. Shikha Singhi
Bank of Baroda
S.K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
